Solo Primary Care

The Solo Primary Care Practice: vendor stack, benchmarks, and buying order

A solo primary-care practice should optimize for time returned to the physician above all. That means outsourced billing on a percent-of-collections model (6–9%), an all-in-one EHR + patient engagement suite priced per-provider (not per-user), an ambient AI scribe integrated with that EHR (target 60+ minutes/day saved), and consulting engaged only for one-off contracting or MSO decisions — not ongoing retainers.

Practice profile

Providers
1 MD/DO or NP + 1–2 support staff
Specialty
Family medicine, internal medicine, general pediatrics
Payer mix
60–80% commercial + Medicare, minimal Medicaid
Monthly encounters
300–500
Typical revenue
$450K–$900K net collections/year
Staff model
Physician, 1 MA, 1 front desk (often cross-trained)

The four decisions that matter most

Decision

In-house vs outsourced billing

Recommendation: Outsource, percent-of-collections

Why: A solo practice can't afford the fixed cost of a certified biller (~$55K+ loaded) unless collections exceed roughly $700K/year AND the physician wants to manage a biller. Below that threshold, an outsourced RCM at 6–9% of net collections is almost always cheaper and lower-risk.

Decision

Standalone EHR vs all-in-one

Recommendation: All-in-one (EHR + PM + patient portal + telehealth)

Why: Integration overhead sinks solo practices. A single vendor that covers scheduling, charting, e-prescribing, patient portal, and telehealth eliminates 3–4 vendor relationships and the interface fees that come with them.

Decision

Ambient AI scribe — yes or no

Recommendation: Yes, if EHR-integrated and priced under ~$300/provider/month

Why: For a solo doc, 60+ minutes/day back is worth ~$200/day of billable capacity or ~4,000 minutes/month of life. The math works at almost any credible scribe price; the risk is EHR integration friction, not the tool itself.

Decision

Credentialing — DIY, contract, or ongoing service

Recommendation: One-time contract for initial enrollment; DIY re-attestations

Why: Initial payer enrollment for one provider is 90–180 days of highly-templated work. Paying $2,500–$5,000 flat to a credentialing specialist for the initial slate is cheap insurance. Re-attestations every 3 years are calendar work a front desk can own.

Recommended vendor stack

Each recommendation links to the relevant buyer guide for deeper criteria.

CategoryRecommendationWhy it fitsBudget
Billing & RCMOutsourced RCM, percent-of-collections (6–9%), with denials + patient statements includedAligns the vendor's incentive with yours, avoids fixed labor cost, includes the boring but revenue-critical work most solo practices under-invest in.6–9% of net collections
EHRAll-in-one cloud EHR + PM + portal + telehealth, per-provider pricing, open APIOne contract, one login, one support number. Verify data export terms in writing before you sign — this is where solo practices get trapped.$500–$900 / provider / month
AI ScribesEHR-native ambient scribe, deployed on shadow charts for 2 weeks before enterprise rolloutIntegration is 80% of the value. A best-of-breed scribe that pastes into your EHR is worse than a merely-good scribe that writes into the note fields directly.$150–$300 / provider / month
CredentialingOne-time initial enrollment package from a credentialing specialist; DIY CAQH maintenancePredictable one-time cost beats an ongoing retainer for a stable single-provider practice.$2,500–$5,000 one-time, then DIY
ConsultingNone on retainer. Engage a fractional practice consultant only for MSO/PE evaluation or a specific ops overhaul.Solo practices burn cash on generic consulting; they benefit from targeted 2–6 week engagements tied to a specific decision.$0 baseline; $5K–$25K per targeted project

Approx. total: $95K–$180K/year total vendor spend for a $650K-revenue solo practice (roughly 15–28% of net collections).

First-year buying playbook

  1. Q1

    EHR + billing baseline. EHR live with clean fee schedule loaded; RCM vendor onboarded with 30-day denial baseline captured.

  2. Q2

    Credentialing + payer contracts. All target payers enrolled or in-process; commercial contracts reviewed against MGMA median rates.

  3. Q3

    AI scribe pilot. Ambient scribe live on all encounters; documentation time measured vs pre-scribe baseline.

  4. Q4

    Optimize. Denial rate < 8%, days-in-AR < 40, physician charting time < 60 min/day, first payer contract renegotiation opened.

Vendor red flags for this archetype

  • Any billing vendor that quotes a flat monthly fee without a per-claim or percent-of-collections comparison — you're likely being priced for their worst customer.
  • EHR vendors that charge separately for the patient portal, telehealth, or e-prescribing. These are commodities in 2026.
  • AI scribe vendors that can't name your EHR in the demo and show a real note flowing into it — 'integration coming Q3' is a red flag.
  • Credentialing services that require a 12-month minimum for a solo, stable provider.
  • Consultants who lead with an MSO/roll-up pitch on the first call.

Common mistakes

  • Buying an enterprise-grade EHR designed for hospital-owned practices — you pay for governance and IT overhead you don't have.
  • Paying for two overlapping tools (e.g., EHR-native messaging AND a separate patient engagement suite).
  • Underestimating the credentialing timeline and starting to see patients before contracts are effective — the resulting write-offs dwarf any credentialing fee.
  • Signing a 3-year EHR contract without a documented data export and off-boarding clause.

When to revisit this stack

  • Adding a second provider — most all-in-one contracts have step pricing that penalizes growth.
  • Payer mix shift of ≥10 percentage points — this changes the billing math.
  • Two consecutive quarters with denial rate > 10% — the vendor may not be a fit.

By Jordan Alderman, MBA, CMPE · Reviewed by Rania Hassan, JD, CHC · Last reviewed · Methodology

Disclosure: Independent editorial. No pay-for-placement, no affiliate rankings. Full editorial standards.